self-defense

  • Colorado Supreme Court: At-Will Workers Can’t Be Fired for Lawful Self-Defense on the Job

    Colorado Supreme Court: At-Will Workers Can’t Be Fired for Lawful Self-Defense on the Job

    Colorado’s highest court has ruled that a private company cannot dismiss an at-will employee simply for using lawful self-defense while working. The decision came from the Colorado Supreme Court on Monday, June 15, 2026, and it was decided by a 5-2 vote.

    The case, Moreno v. Circle K Stores, Inc., centered on whether an employer’s policies and liability concerns can override an individual’s right to protect themselves from immediate danger. The court’s ruling makes clear that when a worker responds lawfully to an imminent threat, that act cannot be treated as grounds for termination.

    In its opinion, the court emphasized that self-defense is not a privilege that disappears when someone clocks in. The justices concluded that a person’s fundamental constitutional protections remain intact in the workplace, even in an at-will employment relationship.

    The ruling also addressed the argument that corporate risk management and insurance-driven rules should control how workers respond during emergencies. The court rejected the idea that liability policies can be used to strip workers of basic rights, underscoring that private employers do not get to nullify constitutional protections through internal rules.

    For employees across Colorado, the decision establishes a clearer boundary between workplace policies and individual rights. From a libertarian perspective, the outcome reinforces a core principle: individuals retain the right to defend their lives, and private corporate policies cannot lawfully punish people for exercising that right when facing imminent danger.

  • East Charlotte Hickory Grove Home Break-In Ends With Suspect Dead, CMPD Investigating

    East Charlotte Hickory Grove Home Break-In Ends With Suspect Dead, CMPD Investigating

    Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police say they are investigating a fatal shooting connected to an apparent home break-in in east Charlotte. The incident occurred on Sunday morning, June 14, 2026, and is being handled as a homicide investigation while officers work to document what happened and why.

    According to police, the call brought officers to the 5800 block of Hickory Grove Road. When they arrived, they found one person described as a suspect already deceased at the scene.

    Investigators indicated the death appeared to involve a gunshot wound consistent with a defensive response during a reported residential breaking and entering. Police have not described any additional suspects at the location, and only a single suspect was reported dead.

    From a rights-focused perspective, the case highlights the reality that residents may be forced to make split-second decisions when faced with an alleged unlawful entry into their home. At the same time, the fact that police are treating the matter as a homicide investigation underscores that such incidents are routinely examined closely, even when the initial information suggests self-defense.

    CMPD has said the investigation is active. Further details, including any determinations about the circumstances leading up to the shooting, are expected to depend on the results of the ongoing review.

  • Marine Veteran Stops Armed Attacker at Leesburg Family Reunion After Gunfire Exchange

    Marine Veteran Stops Armed Attacker at Leesburg Family Reunion After Gunfire Exchange

    A family reunion in Leesburg, Georgia, was disrupted by a sudden outbreak of violence on Sunday, June 7, 2026, when an assailant opened fire on people gathered for the event. What began as a private, peaceful get-together quickly became an active-shooter situation.

    Authorities described the assault as a racially motivated ambush carried out with a rifle. The attacker was later identified as Jeffrey Tyler Kinzer. Reports indicate he was wearing body armor while firing an AR-15 during the incident.

    Among those at the reunion was Ramell Green, a U.S. Marine Corps veteran. As shots were fired, Green drew a defensive handgun and responded, exchanging fire with the rifleman rather than waiting helplessly for the attack to continue.

    Despite the gunman’s body armor and rifle, Green’s return fire struck Kinzer and stopped his ability to continue the assault. Kinzer was hit, incapacitated, and the immediate threat to the gathering was brought under control.

    The incident has renewed attention on the practical value of firearms training and lawful armed self-defense, especially when violence erupts without warning. In this case, a prepared citizen with military experience acted decisively at the moment it mattered, preventing a deadly situation from escalating further.

  • San Jacinto Homeowner Shoots and Kills Shotgun-Armed Intruder After Being Fired Upon, Sheriff Says

    San Jacinto Homeowner Shoots and Kills Shotgun-Armed Intruder After Being Fired Upon, Sheriff Says

    A deadly confrontation unfolded late at night in San Jacinto, California, when a resident encountered an intruder inside his home and the encounter ended in a fatal shooting. Authorities say the incident took place in the 1300 block of Heron Way and is being examined by the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office.

    Investigators describe the case as a straightforward example of self-defense. According to the sheriff’s office, the homeowner was not initially inside his residence at the moment trouble began.

    Officials say the resident was at a neighbor’s house when he became aware of screaming and the sound of gunfire coming from within his own home. The noises prompted him to return to his property to find out what was happening.

    Once back at the residence, the homeowner confronted an intruder who was armed with a shotgun, authorities said. During that encounter, the suspect fired multiple shots at the resident.

    The sheriff’s office reports that the resident responded with gunfire, striking the intruder. The intruder died from the injuries, and the investigation is proceeding with the incident characterized by officials as a clear-cut self-defense situation.

  • Georgia Groom Aaron White Has Charges Dropped in 2024 Wedding-Night Shooting of Bride’s Stepfather

    Georgia Groom Aaron White Has Charges Dropped in 2024 Wedding-Night Shooting of Bride’s Stepfather

    Prosecutors in Henry County, Georgia, have ended the criminal case against Aaron White, the groom who was accused of fatally shooting his bride’s stepfather on the night of their wedding in 2024. The murder and aggravated assault counts filed against White have been formally dismissed, bringing the prosecution to a close.

    The man who died was identified as Jason Maughon, the bride’s stepfather. White’s legal defense centered on self-defense, and that claim became the key issue the state would have needed to overcome to continue pursuing a conviction.

    The Henry County District Attorney’s office, which assumed control of the matter after allegations of forensic misconduct under the prior administration, reviewed the evidence and the posture of the case. After taking over, prosecutors concluded the available proof did not allow them to move forward on the charges under the required legal standards.

    According to the prosecutors’ assessment, they could not negate White’s claim that he acted to protect himself. They also determined they could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that White was the primary aggressor in the confrontation, a finding that undercut the state’s ability to prove the criminal allegations in court.

    With the dismissal now entered, White is no longer facing the murder and aggravated assault charges stemming from the wedding-night shooting. The decision underscores how, in a case involving a self-defense assertion, the government must meet a high burden of proof—and when that burden cannot be met, charges should not proceed.

  • Hazel Park Shooting at Short-Term Rental: Concealed Pistol License Holder Released, City Halts New Rental Permits

    Hazel Park Shooting at Short-Term Rental: Concealed Pistol License Holder Released, City Halts New Rental Permits

    Hazel Park police say a fatal shooting at a short-term rental property on May 29, 2026, has resulted in the release of a 21-year-old man who was initially taken into custody. Investigators concluded the man, who is licensed to carry a concealed firearm, acted in self-defense during an incident that unfolded at a party.

    According to the investigation, the person who died was a 20-year-old man from Detroit. Police allege he pointed a gun at someone attending the gathering while attempting to steal a watch, escalating the situation into a life-threatening confrontation.

    Authorities determined that the 21-year-old concealed carry holder responded to that threat and that the shooting met the standard for self-defense based on the information reviewed by investigators. After being detained while police sorted out what happened, he was later released.

    The case also triggered swift action from city government regarding the property where the party was held. City Manager Ed Klobucher revoked the short-term rental’s license tied to that location, citing the seriousness of the event.

    In addition, Klobucher imposed a citywide pause on issuing new short-term rental licenses. The move effectively freezes expansion of that type of rental in Hazel Park while the city reassesses how these properties are regulated and monitored following the May 29 incident.

  • Tennessee Deputies, TBI Review Fatal Shooting After Sword-Armed Intruder Confrontation in Dandridge

    Tennessee Deputies, TBI Review Fatal Shooting After Sword-Armed Intruder Confrontation in Dandridge

    Authorities in Jefferson County are examining a deadly self-defense incident that unfolded in Dandridge, Tennessee. The case is being handled as a review by the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office, with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation also involved.

    The shooting happened on Riverfront Circle. Investigators say a homeowner used a firearm during a confrontation with a person described as an aggressor who had a sword.

    According to the information released, the encounter ended with the armed individual being shot and killed. Officials have characterized the situation as a homeowner stopping an active threat posed by someone armed with a bladed weapon.

    After the shooting, law enforcement conducted an extensive forensic examination at the scene. Detectives also carried out initial interviews as part of the early fact-finding process.

    Following the on-site work and preliminary questioning, the person who fired the gun was allowed to leave custody. At this stage, no immediate criminal charges have been filed while the Sheriff’s Office and TBI continue their review.

  • Pennsylvania Gun Owners Urged to Oppose Harrisburg “Lock Up Your Safety” Storage Bill

    Pennsylvania Gun Owners Urged to Oppose Harrisburg “Lock Up Your Safety” Storage Bill

    A new push in Harrisburg is drawing criticism from gun-rights advocates who say it would penalize responsible Pennsylvanians while doing little to address violent crime. Opponents have labeled the proposal the “Lock Up Your Safety” bill, arguing it effectively mandates government-approved firearm storage in the home.

    Supporters of the right to keep and bear arms contend that mandatory storage requirements can slow or prevent lawful self-defense, particularly during emergencies when seconds matter. From this viewpoint, the policy risks turning ordinary citizens into targets by making it harder to access a firearm quickly when confronted with a home invasion or other immediate threat.

    Critics also warn that such rules invite enforcement problems and legal exposure for law-abiding people. They argue that once storage methods are dictated by statute, accidental noncompliance could become a criminal issue, even when no harm has occurred. In their view, this shifts the focus from prosecuting criminals to regulating the private conduct of peaceful residents.

    Gun-rights activists are urging Pennsylvanians to contact state lawmakers in Harrisburg to oppose the measure. They frame the issue as both a practical concern—ensuring families can defend themselves—and a constitutional one—preventing state government from imposing broad restrictions on how firearms may be kept inside the home.

    The debate is unfolding in the Pennsylvania Capitol as advocacy groups mobilize supporters to speak up quickly. Opponents of the proposal say the legislature should prioritize policies aimed at violent offenders rather than expanding regulations that primarily affect citizens who already follow the law.

  • Philadelphia Frankford Royal Farms Shooting: Licensed Concealed Carrier Not Arrested After Surveillance Shows Self-Defense

    Philadelphia Frankford Royal Farms Shooting: Licensed Concealed Carrier Not Arrested After Surveillance Shows Self-Defense

    A fatal shooting unfolded late Sunday night at a Royal Farms convenience store in Philadelphia’s Frankford neighborhood, ending with a 22-year-old man dead after a confrontation inside the store. Police reviewed video from the business and treated the incident as a self-defense case involving an armed citizen.

    Investigators said the person who fired the shots was 21 years old and legally carrying a concealed firearm. According to authorities, store surveillance footage captured the older man pointing a gun at the 21-year-old, triggering a rapid, close-range exchange in which the younger man drew his own weapon and fired.

    After examining the video evidence, police did not take the 21-year-old into custody. The decision was tied directly to what investigators described as clear footage showing the younger man responding to an immediate lethal threat rather than initiating the violence.

    The shooting has renewed attention on the reality that violent encounters can erupt without warning in ordinary places like convenience stores, and that the first person to present a firearm can instantly turn a routine stop into a life-or-death emergency. From a pro–self-defense perspective, the case underscores why many law-abiding people choose to carry: the ability to meet force with force when there is no time to wait for help.

    Officials continued to treat the surveillance recording as key evidence as the incident moved forward under the standards that govern defensive gun use. The central facts described by investigators remain that a 22-year-old man was shot and killed, a 21-year-old licensed concealed carrier fired the fatal shots, and police declined an arrest after video showed the deceased man aiming a gun at the shooter first.

  • Austintown Police Call May 13 Car-Wash Shooting Justified After Armed Attack on Vehicle

    Austintown Police Call May 13 Car-Wash Shooting Justified After Armed Attack on Vehicle

    A fatal shooting near a car wash on New Road in Austintown on Wednesday morning, May 13, 2026, is being classified by local police as a justified act of self-defense. Officials said their review indicates the person who fired did so in response to an immediate, violent threat.

    Investigators pointed to surveillance footage that captured the sequence leading up to the gunfire. According to police, the man who was killed was 30-year-old Zachary Fisher, who was pursuing his ex-girlfriend’s vehicle.

    Authorities said the video shows Fisher chasing the vehicle and then wrecking his truck near the location. Immediately afterward, police reported, he moved to confront the occupied vehicle and began an assault while armed.

    Inside the targeted vehicle were two young children and a male passenger, according to police. Officials said the armed attack on the vehicle occurred with the children still inside, escalating the danger to everyone present.

    Police have stated that, based on the evidence they have reviewed, the shooting is being treated as a clear-cut case of self-defense. From a public-safety and individual-rights standpoint, the incident underscores why lawful self-protection is a fundamental last resort when a violent aggressor forces a life-or-death situation on innocent people.