striker-fired handguns

  • NSSF Plans Legal Fight Over Connecticut Ban on Striker-Fired Handgun Sales

    NSSF Plans Legal Fight Over Connecticut Ban on Striker-Fired Handgun Sales

    Connecticut has enacted a new restriction on handgun sales after Gov. Ned Lamont signed a measure that blocks the sale of many striker-fired pistols within the state. The change targets a type of handgun that is widely owned and commonly sold through lawful channels.

    NSSF, which describes itself as the firearm industry’s trade association, says it intends to pursue a legal challenge to the Connecticut prohibition. The organization announced its plans from Washington, D.C., framing the issue as a direct dispute over whether the state can bar a broadly used category of firearms.

    At the center of the conflict is the scope of the ban: NSSF argues the law goes beyond regulating misuse and instead eliminates access to an entire class of handguns that are legally manufactured and commonly chosen by ordinary buyers. From a limited-government perspective, that kind of blanket policy treats responsible residents the same as criminals, even though the measure applies to people who are attempting to purchase firearms through legal, regulated sales.

    NSSF also contends that the new statute violates the Second Amendment rights of Connecticut residents who follow the law. In its view, the state’s action represents an unconstitutional infringement by preventing citizens from purchasing certain handguns solely because of their design category, rather than because of any unlawful conduct.

    The group’s planned court fight is aimed at overturning the sales ban and restoring legal access to these striker-fired handguns in Connecticut. For supporters of individual liberty, the case is expected to test whether state officials can prohibit a popular, lawfully produced type of firearm in a way that restricts lawful ownership for everyone.

  • Gun Rights Groups Sue Maryland After SB 334 Targets Glock-Style Handguns

    Gun Rights Groups Sue Maryland After SB 334 Targets Glock-Style Handguns

    National gun rights organizations moved quickly to court after Maryland Gov. Wes Moore signed Senate Bill 334, launching a federal civil rights lawsuit against state officials. The challenge was filed immediately following the bill’s enactment, signaling that opponents intend to fight the new restrictions well before they begin to be enforced.

    At the center of the dispute is SB 334’s treatment of common semiautomatic pistols, particularly Glock handguns and similar striker-fired designs. The law uses a legal category described as “machine-gun-convertible pistols,” and, under that classification, it sweeps in nearly all Glock models along with comparable firearms.

    The practical effect of the measure is a broad prohibition on key parts of the lawful market for these handguns in Maryland. As written, the statute blocks the sale, manufacture, and transfer of the covered pistols within the state, creating a statewide barrier affecting routine commerce and ownership changes that would otherwise occur legally.

    Supporters of the lawsuit argue that the state is attempting to restrict widely owned firearms by redefining them under a label that implies automatic-fire capability. From a constitutional, limited-government perspective, the move is seen as a step toward banning commonly chosen self-defense tools rather than targeting criminal misuse.

    Although the bill is already signed, its effective date is set for January 1, 2027. That timeline sets the stage for a prolonged court fight, with the plaintiffs seeking to stop the law before it takes effect and Maryland preparing to defend a statute that would reshape which handguns can be legally sold or transferred in the state.