hunting

  • Oregon Initiative Petition 28 Would Criminalize Hunting and Ranching, Putting Conservation Funding at Risk

    Oregon Initiative Petition 28 Would Criminalize Hunting and Ranching, Putting Conservation Funding at Risk

    Oregon could see sweeping changes to long-standing outdoor and agricultural practices if a proposed ballot measure advances. The proposal, known as Initiative Petition 28 (IP 28), is described as a plan to dramatically overhaul state law in ways that would upend how Oregonians interact with wildlife, livestock, and natural resources.

    Under the initiative’s approach, activities that have traditionally been legal and widely practiced would be treated as criminal conduct. The measure would make ranching, hunting, fishing, trapping, recreational shooting, and most forms of animal husbandry illegal, redefining everyday rural and sporting life as something subject to prosecution rather than regulation.

    The reach of the proposal would extend beyond private landowners and sportsmen. The scope described for IP 28 would also implicate institutions and communities that rely on animal care and lawful harvesting, including the Oregon Zoo, fishermen, and tribal groups, pulling a wide range of Oregonians into the consequences of a single legal rewrite.

    From a conservative and libertarian perspective, a ballot initiative that turns broad categories of ordinary work and recreation into crimes represents an aggressive expansion of state power into personal choice, property rights, and cultural tradition. Rather than focusing on targeted enforcement against abuse, this kind of blanket criminalization risks treating responsible citizens as offenders while creating uncertainty for communities built around farming, outdoor recreation, and resource-based livelihoods.

    Supporters of hunting and recreational shooting also warn that the stakes go beyond lifestyle and tradition, pointing to potential downstream effects on conservation funding. When policies discourage or eliminate lawful hunting and shooting-related activity, the funding structures connected to those activities can be weakened, raising concerns about how wildlife management and habitat priorities would be supported going forward if established revenue streams are disrupted.

  • Idaho Hunter Defends His Son, Kills Charging Grizzly at Close Range Near Ashton

    Idaho Hunter Defends His Son, Kills Charging Grizzly at Close Range Near Ashton

    An Idaho man out hunting black bears with his young son in the Caribou-Targhee National Forest ended up in a sudden life-or-death encounter with a grizzly bear. The incident happened on Saturday evening, May 16, 2026, in the area outside Ashton.

    According to authorities, the grizzly was a male and came in fast, closing the gap to extremely close range. The bear reached within about five yards of where the father and child were positioned, leaving almost no time or space to retreat.

    The father fired, fatally shooting the grizzly during the charge. The shooting occurred during what investigators described as a close-range ambush, with the danger unfolding quickly and at point-blank distance.

    After the bear was killed, the incident was promptly reported to the Fremont County Sheriff’s Office. That call set in motion the official response and review of what had occurred in the forest.

    Idaho Fish and Game conducted a joint investigation into the shooting. Following that review, officials concluded the man’s actions were fully justified as a defense of life, reflecting the basic principle that people have a right to protect themselves and their families when an immediate threat leaves no reasonable alternative.