Gun Owners of America

  • Illinois Gun Owners Urged to Oppose Proposed “Backdoor” Handgun Ban

    Illinois Gun Owners Urged to Oppose Proposed “Backdoor” Handgun Ban

    Illinois gun owners are being asked to act quickly in response to what advocates describe as an indirect attempt to restrict access to handguns. The alert focuses on a developing push in Springfield that, in their view, would function like a handgun ban without using that label.

    Supporters of the action warning argue that the approach relies on regulatory and legislative mechanisms that could effectively choke off lawful handgun ownership. They frame the issue as part of a broader pattern in Illinois politics: using administrative hurdles and indirect prohibitions rather than straightforward votes on a clear ban.

    The message to residents is not simply informational; it is a call to get directly involved. Readers are encouraged to contact state lawmakers and make their opposition known while the situation is still in motion, emphasizing that timing matters when bills or policy changes are moving through the process.

    From a conservative and libertarian standpoint, the concern is that policies like this shift power away from ordinary citizens and toward government gatekeepers, limiting constitutional rights through technical compliance traps. Critics argue that such measures punish peaceable gun owners while doing little to address violent criminals who ignore firearm laws.

    The central request is for Illinois residents to participate in the political process—communicating with elected officials and pushing back against any proposal that would reduce the practical ability to buy or own a handgun. The overall objective is to stop what the organizers characterize as a “backdoor” handgun ban before it becomes state policy.

  • Gun Owners of America Backs Byron Donalds in Florida Governor Race

    Gun Owners of America Backs Byron Donalds in Florida Governor Race

    Gun Owners of America has announced its endorsement of Congressman Byron Donalds in the contest for Florida governor. The organization’s backing places Donalds among the candidates drawing early support from major Second Amendment advocates as Florida voters look ahead to the state’s next gubernatorial election.

    The endorsement reflects GOA’s emphasis on protecting the right to keep and bear arms and resisting new restrictions on lawful gun ownership. From a conservative and libertarian standpoint, endorsements like this serve as a clear signal to voters who prioritize constitutional liberties and limited government involvement in personal choices, including self-defense.

    Donalds, a sitting member of the U.S. House of Representatives, is the candidate GOA is aligning with in Florida’s governor race. GOA’s decision highlights the group’s view that the state’s leadership should remain committed to safeguarding firearm rights and maintaining a political environment where law-abiding citizens are not treated as suspects for exercising a constitutional freedom.

    For gun-rights voters, the endorsement is also a reminder that gubernatorial elections have practical consequences. Florida’s governor can influence the direction of state policy, the selection of key officials, and the broader approach to public safety and individual rights—areas where Second Amendment groups frequently argue that enforcement should focus on violent criminals rather than new limits on responsible citizens.

    As the campaign season develops, GOA’s endorsement adds to the growing list of markers that candidates will use to define their priorities for Florida’s future. Voters who view the right to self-defense and the Second Amendment as central issues are likely to weigh endorsements such as this when evaluating who they believe will best defend those principles in the governor’s office.

  • Gun Owners of America and Fuerza 2A Back James Uthmeier for Florida Attorney General

    Gun Owners of America and Fuerza 2A Back James Uthmeier for Florida Attorney General

    Gun Owners of America (GOA) and its Spanish-language outreach arm, Fuerza 2A, announced that they are endorsing James Uthmeier for Florida Attorney General. The groups framed their decision as support for a candidate they believe will defend the right to keep and bear arms in the state’s top law-enforcement legal office.

    The endorsement centers on the role of the attorney general in shaping statewide legal policy and litigation choices that can affect gun owners. GOA and Fuerza 2A emphasized that Florida’s next attorney general will have the ability to influence how state laws are interpreted and defended, including in court actions where Second Amendment issues may be at stake.

    In making their endorsement public, GOA and Fuerza 2A positioned Uthmeier as aligned with a pro-Second Amendment approach to public safety and individual liberties. They presented the backing as part of their broader effort to support officials who, in their view, will resist gun restrictions and prioritize constitutional protections.

    The announcement also highlighted Fuerza 2A’s role in communicating Second Amendment advocacy to Spanish-speaking Floridians. By issuing the endorsement jointly, the organizations signaled that they intend to reach a wide cross-section of voters who care about gun rights and related legal battles in Florida.

    GOA’s statement served as a call for supporters to pay attention to the attorney general contest and to view the office as a key checkpoint against expanding government power over lawful gun ownership. The groups’ endorsement of Uthmeier was presented as a concrete step in that strategy as Florida’s political cycle continues.

  • Tell President Trump to Pardon Tate Adamiak

    Tell President Trump to Pardon Tate Adamiak

    A new call-to-action is urging supporters of gun rights to contact President Donald Trump and ask him to grant a pardon to Tate Adamiak. The appeal is being circulated as a standalone message focused on one request: presidential clemency for Adamiak.

    The campaign is framed as a direct outreach effort to the White House, encouraging people to make their views known to the president. Its central point is that a pardon would be an appropriate remedy in Adamiak’s case, and it asks readers to press that request with President Trump.

    The message is being shared through Gun Owners of America’s public communications, including a post on the organization’s website. The headline and theme are centered on the same instruction—tell President Trump to pardon Tate Adamiak—highlighting the organization’s emphasis on immediate public engagement.

    Gun Owners of America is distributing the alert through its online channels, including its RSS feed, as part of what appears to be a time-sensitive advocacy push. The item presents the pardon request as the main objective, without branching into unrelated policy debates.

    Supporters who agree with the appeal are being asked to take action by communicating their support for a pardon directly to President Trump. The underlying approach is straightforward: mobilize grassroots pressure in favor of clemency for Tate Adamiak.

  • Support Efforts to Repeal the Hughes Amendment and Restore Rights for Law-Abiding Americans

    Support Efforts to Repeal the Hughes Amendment and Restore Rights for Law-Abiding Americans

    A long-standing federal restriction continues to shape what law-abiding Americans can legally own, even when they fully comply with background checks and other requirements. Supporters of the Second Amendment point to the Hughes Amendment as a central reason the supply of transferable, lawfully owned machine guns has been frozen for decades, driving scarcity and cost while doing little to address criminal misuse. The focus of current activism is straightforward: remove the federal prohibition created by that amendment.

    The Hughes Amendment is commonly discussed as the 1986 change that barred civilians from acquiring newly manufactured machine guns for civilian possession, leaving only previously registered firearms eligible for transfer under the existing National Firearms Act system. That framework did not eliminate regulation; it limited what could be added to the legal registry going forward. As a result, only machine guns already in the registry before the cutoff can be transferred to qualified buyers, and that fixed pool has shaped the market ever since.

    Second Amendment advocates argue that the restriction punishes compliance rather than crime. They contend that Americans who can pass the required federal background check, submit fingerprints and photographs when required, pay the applicable tax, and wait through the approval process should not face a categorical ban on newly manufactured transferable firearms. From a liberty-oriented perspective, the issue is less about expanding government processes and more about removing a blanket prohibition that applies to people who are already choosing the legal route.

    The latest calls to action emphasize public involvement. Gun-rights supporters are encouraging readers and members to engage elected officials, keep informed on federal legislation, and back organizations that are working to overturn the Hughes Amendment. In this view, political pressure matters because Congress created the prohibition and Congress can undo it, but lawmakers typically move only when constituents make the issue unavoidable.

    Advocates also stress that repealing the Hughes Amendment would not erase the existing regulatory structure for NFA items; it would change what can be registered and transferred in the future. They present the effort as a step toward aligning federal law with constitutional protections while treating responsible citizens as citizens, not suspects. For supporters, the goal is to restore the ability of qualified Americans to purchase newly made, legally registered machine guns under the same regulated process that already governs NFA transfers.

  • GOA Backs Rep. Lauren Boebert’s Proposal to Repeal the Machine Gun Tax

    GOA Backs Rep. Lauren Boebert’s Proposal to Repeal the Machine Gun Tax

    Gun Owners of America has announced its support for legislation introduced by Rep. Lauren Boebert that would remove the federal tax applied to automatic weapons. The organization’s endorsement centers on eliminating the existing tax burden that applies to these firearms under current federal law.

    Boebert’s measure targets the tax requirement tied to automatic weapons and would end that specific federal charge if enacted. The proposal has drawn attention within Second Amendment advocacy circles as a direct change to how the federal government treats these firearms.

    In its statement backing the bill, Gun Owners of America framed the issue as one of protecting constitutional rights and reducing federal barriers. From a limited-government perspective, the group’s position reflects a broader argument that lawful gun ownership should not be conditioned on special federal taxation.

    The endorsement also highlights how national gun-rights organizations are prioritizing legislative efforts that address not only bans and regulations, but also cost-based restrictions. Supporters typically view these taxes as a policy tool that can discourage ownership through financial pressure rather than through an outright prohibition.

    For now, the development is the introduction of the bill and GOA’s public support for it, setting the stage for continued debate in Congress over whether the tax on automatic weapons should remain in place or be repealed.

  • Kentucky Voters: Cast Your Ballot for Thomas Massie Today

    Kentucky Voters: Cast Your Ballot for Thomas Massie Today

    Kentucky voters are being urged to head to the polls today and support Rep. Thomas Massie. The message is straightforward: today is the day to vote, and Massie is the candidate being highlighted for Kentucky ballots.

    The call to action comes from Gun Owners of America, which is directing attention to Kentucky’s election activity and encouraging turnout. Their post emphasizes immediacy, pointing readers to take action now rather than later.

    Massie, a sitting member of Congress, is the focus of the organization’s appeal to voters in the state. The communication frames the choice as an important one for Kentuckians who prioritize constitutional limits, individual liberty, and the right to keep and bear arms.

    Alongside the endorsement-style message, the central instruction remains clear: participate in today’s election and make sure your vote is counted. The overall thrust is aimed at mobilizing like-minded voters who align with a pro-Second Amendment and small-government outlook.

    The organization’s post is published online through its website and distributed via its RSS feed, reinforcing that the purpose is timely voter engagement. For Kentucky residents eligible to vote today, the takeaway is to show up and cast a ballot for Thomas Massie.

  • Public Comment Urged as ATF Faces Accusations of Building an Unlawful Gun Registry

    Public Comment Urged as ATF Faces Accusations of Building an Unlawful Gun Registry

    A new call is circulating among gun-rights advocates urging Americans to weigh in during a public-comment period over allegations that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is effectively constructing a firearms registry outside the limits set by federal law. Supporters of the effort argue that a centralized record of lawful gun ownership would be incompatible with privacy, due process, and the constitutional boundaries placed on executive agencies.

    The push centers on encouraging individuals to submit comments aimed at stopping what critics describe as an “illegal registry.” In this view, the issue is not merely administrative recordkeeping, but the long-term consequences of government aggregation of sensitive personal data tied to lawful conduct. Advocates emphasize that even if records begin as routine paperwork, large-scale collection can become a de facto registry when data is preserved, organized, and made searchable.

    From a conservative and libertarian perspective, the dispute reflects a broader concern about federal agencies expanding their reach through regulation and internal procedures rather than through clear authorization from Congress. Critics argue that policy choices with major implications for civil liberties should be made through the legislative process, not through administrative actions that are difficult for ordinary citizens to track and challenge.

    Those promoting public participation say comments are a practical way for citizens to register opposition, create an official record of objections, and signal that voters are paying attention. They also argue that sustained public scrutiny can limit agency overreach by increasing political and legal accountability, especially when the subject involves constitutionally protected rights.

    The organizing effort is being publicized by Gun Owners of America, which is directing readers to its post on the issue, titled “Comment Now To Stop the ATF’s Illegal Registry!” The group is using the moment to encourage immediate civic engagement and to frame the controversy as a timely decision point for anyone concerned about the growth of federal power and the protection of Second Amendment rights.