GOA

  • GOA and GOF Ask Virginia Supreme Court to Weigh In Early on Potential “Assault Firearms” Ban

    GOA and GOF Ask Virginia Supreme Court to Weigh In Early on Potential “Assault Firearms” Ban

    Gun Owners of America (GOA) and Gun Owners Foundation (GOF) have turned to the Virginia Supreme Court seeking an early legal decision tied to a proposed statewide restriction they describe as a looming “assault firearms” ban. The groups are asking the court for a preliminary ruling, aiming to clarify the legal landscape before the policy takes effect or advances further.

    The petition centers on the groups’ contention that the state is moving toward a ban affecting firearms they label “assault firearms.” Rather than waiting for later stages of enforcement or additional litigation steps, GOA and GOF are asking the state’s highest court to address the matter at the front end, arguing that early review is warranted given the scope of the issue.

    From a constitutional-rights perspective, this approach reflects a push to prevent the kind of uncertainty that can follow when governments expand restrictions first and resolve core legal questions later. Supporters of the petition see an early ruling as a way to protect Virginians from shifting rules that could affect law-abiding gun owners, firearm retailers, and others trying to follow the law without facing abrupt changes or unclear standards.

    The filing places the Virginia Supreme Court in a key role, as any preliminary guidance from the court could shape how the dispute proceeds and how state officials, lawmakers, and residents understand the legality of the proposed ban. GOA and GOF are positioning the court as the appropriate venue to provide that clarification sooner rather than after prolonged conflict.

    The dispute also underscores the larger policy fight in Virginia over gun control proposals and the boundaries of state power when regulating commonly owned firearms. As GOA and GOF press for early judicial review, the next steps will depend on whether the Virginia Supreme Court agrees to take up the request and issue the preliminary ruling the organizations are seeking.

  • Tell President Trump to Pardon Tate Adamiak

    Tell President Trump to Pardon Tate Adamiak

    A new call-to-action is urging supporters of gun rights to contact President Donald Trump and ask him to grant a pardon to Tate Adamiak. The appeal is being circulated as a standalone message focused on one request: presidential clemency for Adamiak.

    The campaign is framed as a direct outreach effort to the White House, encouraging people to make their views known to the president. Its central point is that a pardon would be an appropriate remedy in Adamiak’s case, and it asks readers to press that request with President Trump.

    The message is being shared through Gun Owners of America’s public communications, including a post on the organization’s website. The headline and theme are centered on the same instruction—tell President Trump to pardon Tate Adamiak—highlighting the organization’s emphasis on immediate public engagement.

    Gun Owners of America is distributing the alert through its online channels, including its RSS feed, as part of what appears to be a time-sensitive advocacy push. The item presents the pardon request as the main objective, without branching into unrelated policy debates.

    Supporters who agree with the appeal are being asked to take action by communicating their support for a pardon directly to President Trump. The underlying approach is straightforward: mobilize grassroots pressure in favor of clemency for Tate Adamiak.

  • GOA Backs Rep. Lauren Boebert’s Proposal to Repeal the Machine Gun Tax

    GOA Backs Rep. Lauren Boebert’s Proposal to Repeal the Machine Gun Tax

    Gun Owners of America has announced its support for legislation introduced by Rep. Lauren Boebert that would remove the federal tax applied to automatic weapons. The organization’s endorsement centers on eliminating the existing tax burden that applies to these firearms under current federal law.

    Boebert’s measure targets the tax requirement tied to automatic weapons and would end that specific federal charge if enacted. The proposal has drawn attention within Second Amendment advocacy circles as a direct change to how the federal government treats these firearms.

    In its statement backing the bill, Gun Owners of America framed the issue as one of protecting constitutional rights and reducing federal barriers. From a limited-government perspective, the group’s position reflects a broader argument that lawful gun ownership should not be conditioned on special federal taxation.

    The endorsement also highlights how national gun-rights organizations are prioritizing legislative efforts that address not only bans and regulations, but also cost-based restrictions. Supporters typically view these taxes as a policy tool that can discourage ownership through financial pressure rather than through an outright prohibition.

    For now, the development is the introduction of the bill and GOA’s public support for it, setting the stage for continued debate in Congress over whether the tax on automatic weapons should remain in place or be repealed.

  • Virginia Gov. Spanberger Enacts SB 749 Assault Weapons Ban, Prompting Two Rapid-Fire Legal Challenges

    Virginia Gov. Spanberger Enacts SB 749 Assault Weapons Ban, Prompting Two Rapid-Fire Legal Challenges

    Virginia has enacted a major new firearms restriction after Governor Abigail Spanberger signed Senate Bill 749 into law. The measure creates a statewide prohibition on what the statute labels “assault weapons” as well as a ban on “high-capacity” magazines.

    The law is not immediate. Its effective date is set for July 1, 2026, giving residents, retailers, and law enforcement a defined timeline before the new rules take effect.

    Even with that delayed start, opponents moved quickly to contest the policy in court. The signing was followed right away by two separate lawsuits, each taking a different route to challenge the legislation.

    One case was filed in Virginia’s state courts by Gun Owners of America (GOA) and the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL). Their approach relies on a distinctive argument grounded solely in the Virginia Constitution, aiming to keep the dispute framed as a state-law question rather than a federal one.

    A second challenge was filed in federal court by the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC). That filing is structured to pursue a streamlined path that seeks to avoid review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and instead position the case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court as directly as possible.

    Together, the paired lawsuits set up a two-front legal fight—one focusing on state constitutional claims and the other targeting federal review—over a law that bans specified firearms and magazines across Virginia beginning July 1, 2026.