My Right To Carry

conservative politics

  • Gun Owners of America Backs Byron Donalds in Florida Governor Race

    Gun Owners of America Backs Byron Donalds in Florida Governor Race

    My Right To Carry News Team

    My Right To Carry News Team

    Gun Owners of America has announced its endorsement of Congressman Byron Donalds in the contest for Florida governor. The organization’s backing places Donalds among the candidates drawing early support from major Second Amendment advocates as Florida voters look ahead to the state’s next gubernatorial election.

    The endorsement reflects GOA’s emphasis on protecting the right to keep and bear arms and resisting new restrictions on lawful gun ownership. From a conservative and libertarian standpoint, endorsements like this serve as a clear signal to voters who prioritize constitutional liberties and limited government involvement in personal choices, including self-defense.

    Donalds, a sitting member of the U.S. House of Representatives, is the candidate GOA is aligning with in Florida’s governor race. GOA’s decision highlights the group’s view that the state’s leadership should remain committed to safeguarding firearm rights and maintaining a political environment where law-abiding citizens are not treated as suspects for exercising a constitutional freedom.

    For gun-rights voters, the endorsement is also a reminder that gubernatorial elections have practical consequences. Florida’s governor can influence the direction of state policy, the selection of key officials, and the broader approach to public safety and individual rights—areas where Second Amendment groups frequently argue that enforcement should focus on violent criminals rather than new limits on responsible citizens.

    As the campaign season develops, GOA’s endorsement adds to the growing list of markers that candidates will use to define their priorities for Florida’s future. Voters who view the right to self-defense and the Second Amendment as central issues are likely to weigh endorsements such as this when evaluating who they believe will best defend those principles in the governor’s office.

  • Virginia Senators Push Federal Gun-Control Agenda Beyond State Lines

    Virginia Senators Push Federal Gun-Control Agenda Beyond State Lines

    My Right To Carry News Team

    My Right To Carry News Team

    Two U.S. senators from Virginia are being criticized by gun-rights advocates for promoting a national approach to firearms policy that mirrors strategies used in their home state. Critics argue the effort is designed to export restrictive measures nationwide rather than leave such decisions to states and local communities.

    The concern, as framed by opponents, is not simply about individual bills but about a broader governing philosophy that treats gun ownership as something to be constrained through layered regulations. From a conservative and libertarian perspective, that approach is viewed as incompatible with the Second Amendment and with the idea that constitutional rights should not depend on shifting political majorities.

    Gun-rights groups also object to the federalization of policies that have been fought over at the state level, warning that a Washington-driven framework can override regional differences and weaken accountability. They argue that when rules are set nationally, citizens have fewer practical options to resist, revise, or replace policies that they believe infringe on fundamental liberties.

    The push has been characterized by critics as part of a larger national gun-control campaign in which elected officials use federal power to impose limitations that might not pass in many states on their own. Opponents say this strategy relies on central authority to achieve outcomes that are politically difficult to secure through a more decentralized system.

    Supporters of stronger gun restrictions generally frame their priorities as public-safety measures, while opponents counter that the practical effect is to burden lawful owners rather than stop criminals. In that view, expanding Virginia-style tactics across the country risks turning a contested state-level agenda into a uniform federal standard.

    The dispute underscores an ongoing national divide: whether firearms policy should be tightened through broader regulation or whether policymakers should prioritize enforcement of existing laws while protecting the right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. For critics of the Virginia senators’ direction, the central issue is preventing what they see as an aggressive, top-down attempt to reshape gun rights across the entire United States.