My Right To Carry

AR-15

  • Marine Veteran Stops Armed Attacker at Leesburg Family Reunion After Gunfire Exchange

    Marine Veteran Stops Armed Attacker at Leesburg Family Reunion After Gunfire Exchange

    My Right To Carry News Team

    My Right To Carry News Team

    A family reunion in Leesburg, Georgia, was disrupted by a sudden outbreak of violence on Sunday, June 7, 2026, when an assailant opened fire on people gathered for the event. What began as a private, peaceful get-together quickly became an active-shooter situation.

    Authorities described the assault as a racially motivated ambush carried out with a rifle. The attacker was later identified as Jeffrey Tyler Kinzer. Reports indicate he was wearing body armor while firing an AR-15 during the incident.

    Among those at the reunion was Ramell Green, a U.S. Marine Corps veteran. As shots were fired, Green drew a defensive handgun and responded, exchanging fire with the rifleman rather than waiting helplessly for the attack to continue.

    Despite the gunman’s body armor and rifle, Green’s return fire struck Kinzer and stopped his ability to continue the assault. Kinzer was hit, incapacitated, and the immediate threat to the gathering was brought under control.

    The incident has renewed attention on the practical value of firearms training and lawful armed self-defense, especially when violence erupts without warning. In this case, a prepared citizen with military experience acted decisively at the moment it mattered, preventing a deadly situation from escalating further.

  • Colorado Issues First Guidance on Its New Semi-Auto Firearm Restriction Framework

    Colorado Issues First Guidance on Its New Semi-Auto Firearm Restriction Framework

    My Right To Carry News Team

    My Right To Carry News Team

    Colorado lawmakers moved away from the familiar “assault weapon” ban model and adopted a different method for regulating AR-15-style rifles and other semi-automatic firearms. That shift has left gun owners, dealers, and policymakers trying to determine how broad the new system will be once it is fully in effect.

    A central uncertainty has been scope: which firearms will be captured by the new restrictions, and how many commonly owned models could end up covered. With the effective date approaching, the practical question has become less about labels and more about how the state intends to apply the rules in real-world transactions.

    The state has now provided an initial signal of how it interprets its own framework. While early in implementation, this first public answer is significant because it begins to define the boundaries of a regulatory approach that is designed to reach beyond the usual statutory wording used in past “assault weapon” debates.

    From a conservative and libertarian perspective, that kind of open-ended uncertainty is itself a policy problem. When rules are not clearly defined from the start, ordinary people are left guessing about compliance, and lawful commerce can be chilled even before enforcement begins. For gun owners and small businesses, clarity is not a luxury; it is the baseline for due process and predictable treatment under the law.

    As Colorado’s semi-auto restriction regime moves closer to its start date, the state’s first guidance will likely shape how residents evaluate what they can buy, keep, or transfer under the new system. The next phases will determine whether this “novel approach” ends up functioning as a narrowly tailored policy or a wide-reaching net that affects far more firearms than many expect.

  • Virginia Surges to No. 2 in U.S. Rifle Purchases as Possible AR-15 Sales Ban Nears

    Virginia Surges to No. 2 in U.S. Rifle Purchases as Possible AR-15 Sales Ban Nears

    My Right To Carry News Team

    My Right To Carry News Team

    Virginia has climbed to the second-highest spot nationally for rifle purchases as residents move quickly to buy firearms and standard-capacity magazines amid uncertainty over a potential state crackdown. The shift comes as lawmakers advance restrictions that could soon limit what can be sold, prompting many buyers to act before any new rules take effect.

    The immediate driver is pending legislation that would prohibit the sale of commonly owned semi-automatic rifles, including AR-15-style firearms, along with the ammunition magazines typically sold with them. Rather than waiting for the governor’s decision, Virginians have been heading to gun shops now, treating the current window as possibly their last chance to purchase the affected items through normal retail channels.

    This rush has reordered where Virginia sits compared with other states, pushing it near the top of the national rankings for rifle sales. The jump reflects a familiar pattern seen in other jurisdictions: when a ban is proposed or close to being signed, demand accelerates as citizens try to secure lawful products before the market changes.

    From a conservative and libertarian perspective, the situation underscores how regulatory threats can distort consumer behavior and burden ordinary people who want to exercise a fundamental right without being forced into a last-minute scramble. It also highlights the practical reality that bans often push otherwise routine purchases into a time-sensitive decision driven by politics rather than personal readiness or long-term planning.

    For now, the outcome hinges on whether the governor signs the measure. Until that decision is made, Virginia’s gun retailers and buyers are operating in a climate shaped by the possibility that sales of popular semi-automatic firearms and their standard magazines could soon be off-limits in the state.

  • DOJ’s Colorado Gun Lawsuits Face a Tight Political Timeline

    DOJ’s Colorado Gun Lawsuits Face a Tight Political Timeline

    My Right To Carry News Team

    My Right To Carry News Team

    The Justice Department’s latest move in Colorado has energized gun-rights supporters who want courts to strike down bans on AR-15-style rifles and limits on magazine capacity across the country. From a libertarian and conservative perspective, the development is notable not only for what it signals about federal enforcement priorities, but also for how quickly the window for meaningful progress could close.

    At the center of the moment is timing. The Trump Administration’s action is being read by advocates as a fresh tailwind for challenges to restrictions that have become common in blue states. Still, even a favorable legal posture can be undermined if key decisions don’t arrive soon enough to matter, especially when political control and administrative direction can shift on an election cycle.

    Colorado is now a focal point because the federal government has chosen to press its position through lawsuits in that state. Supporters of the effort see this as a chance to bring added legal pressure against policies they view as unconstitutional burdens on lawful ownership and self-defense. But the pace of litigation is rarely predictable, and that reality creates risk for any strategy dependent on fast-moving court schedules.

    The broader stakes reach beyond Colorado. If bans on AR-15s and magazine limits can be defeated in court, the outcomes could influence similar laws elsewhere by shaping precedent and offering a roadmap for future challenges. Gun-rights groups have long argued that commonly owned firearms and standard-capacity magazines should not be treated as exceptional or prohibited items, and they’re watching closely for signals that courts may be willing to take that position.

    Even so, the underlying question is whether the Justice Department’s effort can clear major procedural hurdles before the political calendar reshuffles the incentives and priorities in Washington. A change in administration can alter litigation strategy, settlement posture, and the intensity with which the federal government pursues a case. That uncertainty is why observers describe the situation as a race: the legal arguments may be strong, but the clock can be just as decisive.