My Right To Carry

Current News

GOA Backs Rep. Lauren Boebert’s Proposal to Repeal the Machine Gun Tax

My Right To Carry News Team

May 21, 2026

Gun Owners of America has announced its support for legislation introduced by Rep. Lauren Boebert that would remove the federal tax applied to automatic weapons. The organization’s endorsement centers on eliminating the existing tax burden that applies to these firearms under current federal law.

Boebert’s measure targets the tax requirement tied to automatic weapons and would end that specific federal charge if enacted. The proposal has drawn attention within Second Amendment advocacy circles as a direct change to how the federal government treats these firearms.

In its statement backing the bill, Gun Owners of America framed the issue as one of protecting constitutional rights and reducing federal barriers. From a limited-government perspective, the group’s position reflects a broader argument that lawful gun ownership should not be conditioned on special federal taxation.

The endorsement also highlights how national gun-rights organizations are prioritizing legislative efforts that address not only bans and regulations, but also cost-based restrictions. Supporters typically view these taxes as a policy tool that can discourage ownership through financial pressure rather than through an outright prohibition.

For now, the development is the introduction of the bill and GOA’s public support for it, setting the stage for continued debate in Congress over whether the tax on automatic weapons should remain in place or be repealed.
Kentucky Voters: Cast Your Ballot for Thomas Massie Today

My Right To Carry News Team

May 20, 2026

Kentucky voters are being urged to head to the polls today and support Rep. Thomas Massie. The message is straightforward: today is the day to vote, and Massie is the candidate being highlighted for Kentucky ballots.

The call to action comes from Gun Owners of America, which is directing attention to Kentucky’s election activity and encouraging turnout. Their post emphasizes immediacy, pointing readers to take action now rather than later.

Massie, a sitting member of Congress, is the focus of the organization’s appeal to voters in the state. The communication frames the choice as an important one for Kentuckians who prioritize constitutional limits, individual liberty, and the right to keep and bear arms.

Alongside the endorsement-style message, the central instruction remains clear: participate in today’s election and make sure your vote is counted. The overall thrust is aimed at mobilizing like-minded voters who align with a pro-Second Amendment and small-government outlook.

The organization’s post is published online through its website and distributed via its RSS feed, reinforcing that the purpose is timely voter engagement. For Kentucky residents eligible to vote today, the takeaway is to show up and cast a ballot for Thomas Massie.
Hopkins County Homeowner Fires One Shot After Intruder Smashes Glass Front Door, Suspect Dies

My Right To Carry News Team

May 19, 2026

A deadly break-in attempt in Hopkins County ended Tuesday morning, May 19, 2026, when a homeowner used a firearm to stop a man forcing his way into the residence. Authorities say the resident fired a single round during the confrontation.

According to the available account, the intruder became violent at the front entry and began attacking the home’s glass front door. As the man tried to breach the doorway, the homeowner responded with one defensive shot.

Video from a Ring doorbell camera captured the incident. The recording shows the suspect shouting while repeatedly hitting the glass before the shot is fired.

The intruder was struck by that single round and later died from the injury. The confrontation occurred as the suspect was actively attempting to get through the front entrance.

From a self-defense and property-rights perspective, the case underscores why many residents choose to maintain the ability to protect themselves at home when confronted with a forced entry in progress. In this incident, the confrontation was brief, happened at the threshold of the home, and concluded with one shot fired.
Kentucky Voters: Back Thomas Massie in Tomorrow’s Election

My Right To Carry News Team

May 19, 2026

Kentucky voters head to the polls tomorrow with a clear choice about the direction of the state’s representation in Washington. For those who prioritize limited government and constitutional principles, the election is an opportunity to support a candidate aligned with those values.

U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie is on the ballot in Kentucky, and his supporters are urging voters to turn out and cast their vote for him. The message is straightforward: show up tomorrow and make your preference count.

The call to action is aimed squarely at Kentuckians who want an elected official known for resisting federal overreach and backing individual liberties. In that view, elections are one of the most direct ways for citizens to push back against policies that expand government power.

Because turnout can decide outcomes, supporters emphasize voting promptly and making sure friends and family participate as well. The focus is on practical civic engagement—getting to the polls and ensuring the result reflects the voters who care enough to act.

With the vote happening tomorrow in Kentucky, the immediate task for Massie’s backers is simple: participate in the election and support Thomas Massie at the ballot box.
Virginia Gov. Spanberger Enacts SB 749 Assault Weapons Ban, Prompting Two Rapid-Fire Legal Challenges

My Right To Carry News Team

May 18, 2026

Virginia has enacted a major new firearms restriction after Governor Abigail Spanberger signed Senate Bill 749 into law. The measure creates a statewide prohibition on what the statute labels “assault weapons” as well as a ban on “high-capacity” magazines.

The law is not immediate. Its effective date is set for July 1, 2026, giving residents, retailers, and law enforcement a defined timeline before the new rules take effect.

Even with that delayed start, opponents moved quickly to contest the policy in court. The signing was followed right away by two separate lawsuits, each taking a different route to challenge the legislation.

One case was filed in Virginia’s state courts by Gun Owners of America (GOA) and the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL). Their approach relies on a distinctive argument grounded solely in the Virginia Constitution, aiming to keep the dispute framed as a state-law question rather than a federal one.

A second challenge was filed in federal court by the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC). That filing is structured to pursue a streamlined path that seeks to avoid review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and instead position the case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court as directly as possible.

Together, the paired lawsuits set up a two-front legal fight—one focusing on state constitutional claims and the other targeting federal review—over a law that bans specified firearms and magazines across Virginia beginning July 1, 2026.
Virginia Enacts “Assault Weapon” and Magazine Limits, Shifting the Fight to the Courts

My Right To Carry News Team

May 18, 2026

Virginia’s debate over restricting certain firearms and ammunition magazines has moved into a new phase. After a prolonged period of uncertainty, the proposals targeting so-called “assault weapons” and magazines are no longer merely pending ideas. They are now part of state law, closing out the immediate legislative contest.

With enactment complete, the next arena is the judiciary. The push to reverse these new limits is expected to take shape through lawsuits aimed at invalidating the bans. In other words, the political process has produced an outcome, and opponents are now preparing to challenge that outcome through legal claims.

From a conservative and libertarian standpoint, this transition matters because it changes what success looks like. Instead of persuading lawmakers or the governor, critics must now convince judges that the restrictions cannot stand under the relevant constitutional standards that govern firearms regulations.

The road ahead will likely be defined by procedural choices as much as headline issues: who brings the case, where it is filed, and what immediate relief is requested. The initial legal actions will shape the pace and direction of the broader effort to roll back the newly enacted hardware and magazine rules.

For supporters of robust Second Amendment protections, the immediate takeaway is straightforward: the policy fight has ended for now, but the contest over rights and limits is only beginning. The practical path forward runs through litigation intended to undo Virginia’s “assault weapon” and magazine bans now that they have become law.
South Austin Shooting Spree Prompts Lockdown as Two Suspects Are Held and One Remains Sought

My Right To Carry News Team

May 17, 2026

South Austin faced a wide-ranging emergency response over the weekend after a roaming series of shootings unfolded across multiple locations. Authorities said the incidents appeared to be unprovoked and spread quickly enough to spark fear across several neighborhoods.

Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis said investigators have linked the violence to at least 10 separate shooting sites. The attacks were described as seemingly random, with shots fired at people traveling in vehicles, turning ordinary trips on local roads into potential targets.

Police reported that four people were hurt during the spree. As information came in from different scenes, law enforcement expanded its response and issued shelter-in-place instructions affecting more than one neighborhood, effectively placing large parts of South Austin under a temporary lockdown.

Officials also said two local fire stations were among the locations that came under fire. The inclusion of emergency-service facilities underscored how indiscriminate the pattern appeared, and it forced a broader safety posture while authorities worked to determine the scope of what occurred.

Chief Davis confirmed that two suspects have been arrested in connection with the shootings. Police said they are still searching for another person believed to be involved, and the manhunt remained active as the investigation continued. The scale of the response, including the shelter order, reflected the reality that public safety ultimately depends on rapid accountability for offenders and the ability of law-abiding residents to protect themselves when violence erupts without warning.
NSSF Backs Lawsuit Challenging Virginia’s HB 217 and SB 749 Firearm Ban

My Right To Carry News Team

May 15, 2026

NSSF, the trade association representing the firearm industry, announced in Washington, D.C., that it is financing a newly filed lawsuit against the Commonwealth of Virginia. The organization says the case challenges state actions it believes conflict with both the U.S. Constitution and the Virginia Constitution.

At the center of the dispute is Virginia’s recently enacted legislation identified as HB 217 and SB 749. According to NSSF, the law is sweeping in scope and imposes a prohibition involving certain firearms.

NSSF states the statute bars the sale and transfer of firearms that, in its view, are specifically protected for private ownership under constitutional guarantees. The lawsuit, NSSF says, is aimed at stopping what it characterizes as unconstitutional restrictions embedded in the new measure.

By choosing to fund the litigation, the organization is positioning the courts as the venue to resolve whether Virginia’s approach aligns with constitutional limits. The filing signals that the debate over how far state government can go in regulating commonly owned firearms is likely to continue in courtroom proceedings.

NSSF’s announcement frames the legal challenge as a direct response to the enactment of HB 217 and SB 749 and the restrictions the organization says those bills impose on lawful commerce and private transfers. The case now turns on judicial review of the law’s compatibility with the federal and state constitutions cited in the complaint.
NRA Cuts Legal Spending and Builds Assets in 2025, Even as Membership Dues Keep Falling

My Right To Carry News Team

May 15, 2026

The National Rifle Association reported a stronger financial position in 2025, showing higher assets and a noticeable reduction in overall spending. The organization’s latest numbers indicate it managed to slow its financial slide compared with recent years, even as one key revenue stream continued to weaken.

A major driver of the improved cost picture was a sharp pullback in legal outlays. After years in which courtroom fights and related expenses weighed heavily on the NRA’s budget, 2025 reflected a year in which those legal costs were substantially reduced, helping the group bring total expenses down.

At the same time, the organization’s asset base increased during the year. That growth, paired with the spending cuts, suggests the NRA was able to stabilize operations and shore up its balance sheet, at least in the near term, despite operating in a challenging political and regulatory environment.

However, the numbers also show continuing softness in the group’s membership-driven income. Revenue from member dues declined again in 2025, indicating that the NRA’s ability to rely on grassroots financial support is still under pressure, even though the overall financial picture improved.

From a pro-Second Amendment and limited-government perspective, the report highlights the practical reality that major advocacy groups can be forced to divert significant resources into legal defense when targeted by political opponents or regulators. While the NRA’s reduced legal spending and higher assets mark a step toward financial steadiness in 2025, the continued drop in dues revenue shows the organization still faces the longer-term task of rebuilding and retaining its membership support.
Axelrod Interview Highlights AOC Comment Pointing to Criminal Misuse Over Lawful Gun Ownership

My Right To Carry News Team

May 14, 2026

David Axelrod, a senior fellow at the University of Chicago Institute of Politics and a longtime strategist associated with former President Barack Obama, recently held an extended conversation with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York. The discussion lasted about an hour and a half and touched on public policy issues, including the country’s ongoing debate over firearms and violence.

Ocasio-Cortez is widely known as a supporter of stricter gun regulations. In the course of the interview, however, she made an observation that aligns with a longstanding argument from gun-rights advocates: that lawful gun owners are not the driving force behind violent crime, and that the focus should remain on those who choose to break the law.

From a conservative and libertarian viewpoint, that distinction matters because it separates peaceful, legal conduct from criminal behavior. Treating firearm ownership itself as the central problem can shift attention away from accountability for offenders and away from policies aimed at preventing repeat crimes, targeting illegal possession, and enforcing existing laws against violent actors.

The exchange also underscores a basic point often missed in national discussions: millions of Americans own firearms without harming anyone, while a smaller number of individuals commit acts of violence. When policymakers frame solutions around broad restrictions on ordinary citizens, they risk burdening people who are already compliant with the law while leaving core drivers of violence—criminal intent and criminal actions—insufficiently addressed.

The interview, notable for its length and for Axelrod’s prominence in Democratic political circles, offered a moment where common ground briefly appeared in a polarized policy area. Even without changing her broader views, Ocasio-Cortez’s remark in that setting served as a reminder that the central issue in violent crime is the perpetrator—and that effective responses should prioritize public safety strategies that target criminals rather than sweeping limitations on lawful ownership.